Chatigny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE E. ANDREYEV, Case No. 2:24-cv-2651-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DANIEL CHATIGNY, et al., Defendants. 16 Eugene E. Andreyev (“plaintiff”) alleges that his rights were violated when, in October 2023, Placer County sheriff’s deputies unlawfully drew his blood, deprived him of his right to familial association, and falsely arrested and detained him. ECF No. 9 at 7-8. As in his previous complaints, plaintiff has not identified any of the “Doe” deputy defendants. The only named defendants are Sheriff Wayne Woo and County Executive Officer Daniel Chatigny, both of whom are sued only in their official capacities. Id. at 7. I will recommend that the claims against Woo and Chatigny be dismissed. Additionally, plaintiff shall have sixty days to provide identifying information for at least one of the “Doe” defendants so that service may be effected. If he fails to do so, I will recommend…