Dennis Roy Peterson v. Third Appellate District Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20252:24-cv-03103California397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS ROY PETERSON, No. 2:24-cv-03103-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER & FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT,

15 Respondent.

17 18 Petitioner is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. He has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 10, 2025, the court screened the petition and dismissed it with leave to amend within 30 days. ECF No. 9. The screening order warned petitioner that failure to comply could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that petitioner is unable or unwilling to cure the defects in the petition. //// ] Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.