Turner

Turner v. BBV Profit Sharing Plan CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 26, 2025A170257California5,614 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

I. BACKGROUND3

According to Bernice’s operative cross-complaint, Bear Bruin Ventures, Inc. is doing business as Milestone, and Milestone is doing business as MERS Link 4. Stuart is the owner and director of BBV and the president of Bear Bruin Ventures, Inc. Hamilton is a licensed real estate salesperson employed by Stuart. In 2013, Bernice obtained full title to the Property. The following year, she executed and recorded a grant deed gifting a 50 percent interest in the

2 We acknowledge that the potential sale of her residence in the

partition action has undoubtedly caused Bernice a lot of heartache. But while we sympathize with Bernice, she has not met her burden as the appellant to demonstrate that she has standing to challenge the foreclosure of Michael’s 50 percent interest in the Property. 3 On March 3, 2025, Bernice filed a motion to consolidate this appeal

with the appeal in Turner v. BBV Profit Sharing Plan, case No. A168874, for purposes of oral argument, or, in the alterative, to assign both appeals to the same appellate panel “to promote judicial efficiency and ensure consistent consideration of the overlapping factual and legal issues.” We agree that argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.