Turner

Turner v. BBV Profit Sharing Plan CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 26, 2025A168874California7,000 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

I. BACKGROUND3

A. Factual Background In 2013, Bernice acquired title to the Property. The Property was subject to a first deed of trust. To pay off the first deed of trust, Bernice obtained a loan from Milestone Financial, LLC (Milestone), a private lender. Hamilton worked for Milestone at that time, and she was the person who dealt with Bernice’s loan brokers. Stuart was the manager of Milestone. The following year, Bernice granted Michael a 50 percent interest in the Property. The grant deed stated that she was transferring to Michael an

2 While we sympathize with Bernice’s situation, we must affirm the

judgment because she has not shown that the trial court erred in granting BBV’s summary judgment motion or in denying her motion to vacate the judgment or for a new trial. 3 On March 3, 2025, Bernice filed a motion to consolidate this appeal

with the appeal in Turner v. BBV Profit Sharing Plan et al., case No. A170257, for purposes of oral argument, or, in the alterative, to assign both appeals to the same appellate panel “to promote judicial efficiency and ensure consistent consideration of the overlapping factual and legal issues.” We agree that argument should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.