Hirashima

Weston Mcrae v. Trisha Hashirama, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20252:25-cv-02246California1,225 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTON MCRAE, Case No. 2:25-cv-2246-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

TRISHA HASHIRAMA, et al. Defendants. 16 Weston Mcrae (“plaintiff”) brings this action against Judge Trisha Hashirama, a Placer County Superior Court judge, Placer County itself, Alexander Rich, a private attorney, and Carter Rich PC, a private law firm. ECF No. 1 at 5. His claims involve adverse rulings made by Judge Hashirama, alleged professional misconduct by defendant Rich and firm, and Placer County itself, which plaintiff alleges maintains policies that discriminate against pro se litigants. Id. at 6- 7. These allegations do not implicate any federal claim, and I recommend that this action be dismissed without leave to amend. In so recommending, I will deny plaintiff’s motion for electronic filing, ECF No. 3. Plaintiff may renew that motion if these recommendations are not adopted. I will also grant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.