Reed

Mark Anthony Reed v. Frank J. Bisignano, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20255:22-cv-03942California3,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARK ANTHONY REED, Case No. 5:22-cv-03942-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; DENYING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

FRANK J. BISIGNANO, ET AL., SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. 12 Re: Dkt. No. 36

Plaintiff Mark Anthony Reed (“Reed”) appeals the Commissioner of Social Security’s1 14 final decision determining that Reed was not disabled and therefore ineligible for disability 15 benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Mot. for Summ. J. (“MSJ”), ECF No. 14; 16 Cross-MSJ, ECF No. 18; Opp’n to Cross-MSJ, ECF No. 21. 17 Having considered the parties’ motions and the record in this matter, the Court GRANTS 18 Reed’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES the Commissioner’s cross-motion for 19 summary judgment. Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the Commissioner’s final decision and 20 REMANDS for calculation and award of benefits. 21 I. BACKGROUND There are two periods of time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.