Vanezuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEWITT JAMAR THOMAS, Case No. 2:25-cv-2939-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARIA VANEZUELA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action against two property managers—defendants Maria Vanezuela and Ranetta Cann—and two property management companies, defendants John Stewart Company Property Management and Sacramento Housing Redevelopment Agency. His complaint, however, fails to state a claim and is dismissed. I will give plaintiff leave to amend to file an amended complaint that better explains the factual basis of his claims. I will also grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and 28…