Daniel Keith Wilson v. M. De Arton, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL KEITH WILSON, Case No. 2:25-cv-2984-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M. DE ARTON, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Daniel Keith Wilson brings this action against a large but indeterminate number of state officials, agencies, and health care providers. The complaint, which runs to nearly one- hundred and thirty pages, lacks any intelligible narrative throughline, and leaves the reader with no sense of what or even how many claims are at issue. I will dismiss the complaint with leave to amend so that plaintiff may present, if he can, a short and plain statement of his claims. Additionally, in light of the foregoing dismissal, I will recommend that plaintiff’s three motions for temporary restraining order be denied. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28…