Drolette
Robert Anthony Taylor v. Miranda Drolette
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT ANTHONY TAYLOR, No. 2:25-cv-2985 DJC CSK P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MIRANDA DROLETTE, Respondent. 16 By order filed October 17, 2025, petitioner was informed that he failed to sign his habeas application and thirty days’ leave to file a signed application, and to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, was granted. (ECF No. 4.) On December 2, 2025, petitioner was sua sponte granted a fourteen day extension of time to comply with the October 17, 2025 order. Fourteen days have now passed, and petitioner has not submitted a signed habeas petition and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the Court has considered “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public…