Trump

Armando Rodriguez v. President Donald Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20252:25-cv-02986California867 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 2:25-cv-2986-DC-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP,

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff brings this action against President Donald Trump. The complaint’s allegations fail to state a claim. I recommend that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.