Andrea Smith v. Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20253:24-cv-01981California1,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 ANDREA SMITH, Case No. 24-cv-01981-PHK

Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

FOR DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO

v. PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. 11 12 Defendants. 13 RELEVANT BACKGROUND On April 1, 2024, Plaintiff Andrea Smith, proceeding pro se in this action, filed her Complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this lawsuit. See Dkts. 1-2. The Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP application on June 6, 2024. [Dkt. 8]. The Court then proceeded to undertake the mandatory screening of the Complaint required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). On June 30, 2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), as frivolous, for failure to state a claim for relief, and for seeking monetary relief from those who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.