Vongchan

Voradeth Dave V. v. SSA Commissioner

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20253:24-cv-08984California1,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VORADETH DAVE V., Case No. 24-cv-08984-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF

v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER

SSA COMMISSIONER, Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 18 Defendant.

12 On December 12, 2024, self-represented Plaintiff Voradeth Dave V. commenced this action, seeking judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of benefits. Dkt. No. 1. The same day, the Clerk entered a Social Security Procedural Order. The order instructed Plaintiff to “file and serve on [the] Commissioner a brief for the requested relief within 30 days after the answer is filed.” Dkt. No. 4. On March 7, 2025, the Commissioner filed an answer in the form of a certified copy of the administrative record. Dkt. No. 13 (“AR”). When Plaintiff failed to file an opening brief as required by the Social Security Procedural Order, the Court issued an order show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.