Casanova

Andre Leiva v. I. Casanova, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20251:23-cv-00738California1,673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE LEIVA, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00738-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS DEFENDANT Y. MANSOUP

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT

I. CASANOVA, et al.,

SERVICE OF PROCESS

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Andre Leiva is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. 19 The case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical 20 needs claims against Defendants I. Casanova, Y. Mansoup, and Pallimina.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS

22 On September 11, 2025, previously assigned Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin1 issued his 23 Order Directing Service of Complaint. (Doc. 12.) Judge Austin ordered service “on the following 24 Defendants, all of whom were employed at Wasco State Prison at the time of the incidents in 25 question: I. Casanova, a registered nurse; Y. Mansoup, a physician; and Pallimina, a physician.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.