Casanova
Andre Leiva v. I. Casanova, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE LEIVA, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00738-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS DEFENDANT Y. MANSOUP
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT
I. CASANOVA, et al.,
SERVICE OF PROCESS
Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE
18 Plaintiff Andre Leiva is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. 19 The case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical 20 needs claims against Defendants I. Casanova, Y. Mansoup, and Pallimina.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS
22 On September 11, 2025, previously assigned Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin1 issued his 23 Order Directing Service of Complaint. (Doc. 12.) Judge Austin ordered service “on the following 24 Defendants, all of whom were employed at Wasco State Prison at the time of the incidents in 25 question: I. Casanova, a registered nurse; Y. Mansoup, a physician; and Pallimina, a physician.”…