(PC)Brackenridge
Keon Andre Brackenridge v. S.A.T.F. New Corcoran Correctional Officers, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEON ANDRE BRACKENRIDGE, No. 1:25-cv-00352-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. TO SUBSTITUTE NAMES OF DOE
DEFENDANTS
S.A.T.F. NEW CORCORAN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, et al., (ECF No. 27)
Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 2, 2025, the Court ordered service of Plaintiff’s second amended complaint as to Doe Defendants 1 and 2 (correctional officers at Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison and State Prison, Corcoran [SATF]) for excessive in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 21.) However, because a Doe Defendant cannot be served, the Court allowed Plaintiff to subpoena documents from the prison to allow him to identify the Doe Defendants and sent Plaintiff the form AO 88B and form USM-285, for completion and return. (Id.) On…