Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Capital One, N.A., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20251:25-cv-00980California2,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, No. 1:25-cv-00980-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO

CAPITAL ONE, N.A., et al., PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH A COURT ORDER

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 13, 15)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY-DAY DAYS 17 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on August 7, 2025. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on September 18, 2025. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is110 pages long. It asserts 14 causes of action against eight defendants. Plaintiff appears to assert that Defendants improperly sold or assigned an indebted account attributed to Plaintiff and published that account for collections. On October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.