Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Capital One, N.A., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, No. 1:25-cv-00980-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO
CAPITAL ONE, N.A., et al., PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH A COURT ORDER
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 13, 15)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY-DAY DAYS 17 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on August 7, 2025. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on September 18, 2025. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is110 pages long. It asserts 14 causes of action against eight defendants. Plaintiff appears to assert that Defendants improperly sold or assigned an indebted account attributed to Plaintiff and published that account for collections. On October…