Blick
Emanuel James Ramirez v. Dr. Joseph Blick, et al.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20251:25-cv-01231California4,623 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EMANUEL JAMES RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-01231-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
DR. JOSEPH BLICK, et al., BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE
Defendants. TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
14 (ECF Nos. 7, 9).
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
17 Plaintiff Emanuel James Ramirez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 6). His 19 complaint, filed on September 18, 2025, alleges that Defendants (all but one of which are 20 prison doctors) denied him his right to adequate medical care in connection with his Valley 21 Fever diagnosis. (ECF No. 1). 22 On October 2, 2025, the Court screened the complaint and concluded that Plaintiff 23 failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No.…