Blick

Emanuel James Ramirez v. Dr. Joseph Blick, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20251:25-cv-01231California4,623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EMANUEL JAMES RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-01231-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

DR. JOSEPH BLICK, et al., BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

Defendants. TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

14 (ECF Nos. 7, 9).

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

17 Plaintiff Emanuel James Ramirez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 6). His 19 complaint, filed on September 18, 2025, alleges that Defendants (all but one of which are 20 prison doctors) denied him his right to adequate medical care in connection with his Valley 21 Fever diagnosis. (ECF No. 1). 22 On October 2, 2025, the Court screened the complaint and concluded that Plaintiff 23 failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.