Sukhchain S. v. Minga Wofford, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20251:25-cv-01863California2,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUKHCHAIN S.,

Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-01863-TLN-DMC

13 v. ORDER MINGA WOFFORD, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Sukhchain S.’s (“Petitioner”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order1 (“TRO”). (ECF No. 1.) Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (ECF No. 7.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED. 21 On December 15, 2025, Petitioner filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 1.) Based on the substance of Petitioner’s petition and the relief requested therein, the Court liberally construed the petition as a motion for a TRO. (ECF No. 5.) See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). 24 Respondents were ordered to file an opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for TRO and 25 provide the Court with copies of all referenced/relevant portions of Petitioner's A-File and any and all available records related to Petitioner’s allegations. (ECF No. 5.) The Cout…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.