Albarran

Ines H.O. v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20251:25-cv-01878California2,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INES H.O.1,

Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-01878-TLN-JDP

13 v. ORDER CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Ines H.O.’s (“Petitioner”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 8.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Motion is GRANTED. /// /// /// 24 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits petitioner’s full name, using only her first name and last initial, to protect sensitive personal information. See Memorandum re: Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration Opinions, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, Judicial Conference of the United States (May 1, 2018), https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/18-cv-l-suggestion_cacm_0.pdf. The Clerk of Court is directed to update the docket to reflect this change accordingly. 28 I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.