Sved
James Sved v. Aramark Services, Inc., and Does 1-20, inclusive
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES SVED, Case No. 1:25-cv-01914 JLT SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
13 v. (Doc. 7) 14 ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed this action pro se on December 11, 2025, in Mariposa County Superior Court, alleging, among other things, that he was terminated in retaliation for complaining about unsafe conditions in workplace housing maintained by Defendants and for requesting medical and/or housing-related accommodations for his spouse, who was injured in or near their workplace housing. (See generally Doc. 1-2.) On December 17, 2025, Defendants removed the case to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction. (Doc. 1.) On December 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO), seeking (1) “an immediate stay [of] enforcement of the December 30, 2025 move-out deadline imposed on Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s 27 …