(PC)Kelly

James Carl Kelly v. Newsome, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20251:25-cv-01916California2,047 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No. 1:25-cv-01916-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE 11 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S IN

NEWSOME, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION BE

DENIED AND THAT PLAINTIFF BE

Defendants. REQUIRED TO PAY THE FILING FEE IN

FULL IF HE WANTS TO PROCEED WITH

THIS ACTION

15 (ECF Nos. 2, 6)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

18 Plaintiff James Carl Kelly is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action filed on December 18, 2025. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff moves to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (ECF Nos. 2, 6). Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff had at least three “strikes” prior to filing this action, and because he was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed it, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff be required to pay the $405 filing fee in full if he wants to proceed with the action. I. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Pertinent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.