Mojica

Juan David Mojica v. Kustom US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20252:24-cv-03671California2,866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN DAVID MOJICA, No. 2:24-cv-03671-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

KUSTOM US, INC., (Doc. No. 3) Defendant.

16 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. (Doc. No. 3.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Juan David Mojica brings this action against his former employer, defendant Kustom US, Inc. (Doc. No. 1-2.) Based upon the allegations of his complaint, plaintiff asserts three claims arising under California state law: (1) retaliation; (2) wrongful termination; and (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress. (Id. at ¶¶ 23–57.) Defendant moves to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s claims based upon the parties’ Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate, which plaintiff signed during his employment with defendant. (Doc. No. 3-2 at 5–9.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.