(PS)Seales-Perkins

Tuesday Seales-Perkins v. Superior Court of California County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20252:25-cv-03058California1,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TUESDAY SEALES-PERKINS, Case No. 2:25-cv-3058-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff brings this action against the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento. Her complaint, however, fails to state a claim and is dismissed. I will give plaintiff leave to amend to file an amended complaint that better explains the factual basis of her claims. I will also grant her application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.