Ortiz
Azucena Ortiz, on behalf of themselves, and those similarly situated and the State of California, et al. v. Lucero Ag Services, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 AZUCENA ORTIZ, on behalf of Case No. 1:23-cv-01319-JLT-EPG themselves, and those similarly situated and the State of California, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR A
PROTECTIVE ORDER, IN PART
v. (ECF No. 109) LUCERO AG SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Defendants. 15 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ stipulation for a protective order. (ECF No. 109). Upon review, the Court will approve the parties’ stipulation for a protective order, in part. The parties define confidential information subject to protection to include “information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 19 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).” (ECF No. 109, p. 2). But such a 20 definition improperly allows the parties to deem information confidential so long as they 21 themselves believe that it qualifies for protection without ever disclosing the types of information 22 at issue contrary to Local Rule…