Valladolid
Mujaahid F. Harris v. O. Valladolid, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MUJAAHID F. HARRIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01502-JLT-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT CORRECTIONAL v. OFFICER DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING
O. VALLADOLID, et al.,
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE Defendants. REMEDIES BE DENIED 13 (ECF No. 39)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
16 Plaintiff Mujaahid F. Harris is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint arises 18 from events on September 13, 2022,1 while he was in the custody of the California Department 19 of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) at California State Prison (“CSP”), Corcoran. 20 (ECF No. 8, at pp. 2-4). Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth 21 Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Valladolid, Ramirez, Forbes, and 22 Patrick, and…