Edward Paul Cragg v. Garland, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20251:24-cv-01124California1,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 EDWARD PAUL CRAGG, Case No. 1:24-cv-01124-KES-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, v. RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GARLAND, et al.,

DENIED

13 Defendants. (ECF No. 26)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS 16 Plaintiff Paul Cragg is a federal pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s claims arise out of his pretrial detention at Taft Community Correctional Facility (Taft CCF). Plaintiff filed his complaint on September 20, 2024, and alleged that Taft’s policy regarding indigent supply kits violated his constitutional rights. (ECF No. 1). This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint on his conditions of confinement claim against Defendants B.R. Juarez, A. Garcia, S. Soliz, Brown, and Wilson. (ECF Nos. 6, 10 and 17). On December 15, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment regarding the Court’s discharge of its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.