Singh

BMO Bank N.A. v. Jarnail Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20251:25-cv-00725California4,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:25-cv-00725-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED, IN

PART

JARNAIL SINGH, (ECF No. 17) Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS 15 16 Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A. moves for default judgment against Defendant Jarnail Singh on a state law breach of contract claim.1 (ECF No. 17). While the motion also seeks default judgment as to K & K Trans Inc, as will be explained later, K & K Trans Inc has since been dismissed from this case as a defendant. (See ECF Nos. 29, 30). For the reasons given below, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted, in part. Specifically, the Court will recommend that the motion be granted as to Singh for a total award of $269,441.37 with an additional award of pre-judgment interest as specified below. I. BACKGROUND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.