Bobokulov Akmal v. Warden of California City Detention
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBOKULOV AKMAL, No. 1:25-CV-01921-DC-DMC Petitioner,
ORDER
v. WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA CITY
DETENTION,
15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. Because Petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, Respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 7 days after being served a copy of it.
Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other types of habeas…