Singh Y. v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20251:25-cv-01965California758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SINGH Y., No. 1:25-cv-01965-TLN-AC Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE

ANNEX FACILITY,

14 Respondents.

16 Petitioner Singh Y.1 (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee who is representing himself, 17 filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Based on the substance 18 of Petitioner’s brief and the relief requested therein, the Court construes Petitioner’s pleading as a 19 motion for a temporary restraining order. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976) (stating that 20 pleadings by pro se litigants must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted 21 by lawyers). 22 Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner’s request for injunctive relief by 5 p.m. on 23 24 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits petitioner’s full name, using only his first name and last initial, to protect sensitive personal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.