Chestnut

Parvinder Singh S. B. v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20251:25-cv-01981California1,761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PARVINDER SINGH S. B.,

Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-01981-TLN-CSK

13 v. ORDER CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Parvinder Singh S.B.’s1 (“Petitioner”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Motion is GRANTED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Petitioner is an asylum seeker who fled India in 2023 to escape persecution. (ECF No. 2- 1 at 4.) Upon his entry into the United States, Petitioner was briefly detained by the Department 24 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of 25 the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits Petitioner’s full name, using only his first name and last initials, to protect sensitive personal information. See Memorandum Re: 26 Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration Opinions, Committee on Court Administration and Case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.