Linzi Kaylene Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20252:24-cv-03198California7,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINZI KAYLENE ADAMS, No. 2:24-cv-03198 TLN SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381-1383f. The action has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 302(c)(15). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 11) be granted, Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) be denied, and the action be remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration consistent with this order. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for SSI benefits on October 8, 2021, alleging disability beginning October 24, 2017. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.