Carter

Brenda Gaines Hunter v. Crystal Noel Carter, Mark Hawk, Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20252:25-cv-02076California2,822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENDA GAINES HUNTER, No. 2:25-cv-2076 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CRYSTAL NOEL CARTER, MARK

HAWK, PERMANENTE MEDICAL

GROUP, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., and KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff initially requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF Nos. 2-3, 6), but the request was mooted upon plaintiff’s payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff now moves for (1) leave to electronically file all future documents in this action, ECF No. 8; (2) relief from post-filing litigation costs, ECF No. 14; and (3) a thirty-day to sixty-day extension of time to effect service as to defendant Mark Hawk, along with miscellaneous relief in relation thereto, ECF No. 15. For the reasons outlined below, the court denies the motions for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.