David Taylor and Patrick Taylor v. Navient Corp., a Delaware Corporation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20252:25-cv-02687California4,442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID TAYLOR and PATRICK TAYLOR, No. 2:25-cv-2687-TLN-SCR

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 NAVIENT CORP., a Delaware Corporation, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 On September 30, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se in this matter, and their motion is accordingly referred to the undersigned for findings and recommendations pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiffs seek to enjoin Defendants from taking any collection action based on the loans at issue in this action, and from communicating with any credit reporting agencies about these debts. ECF No. 6 at 1-2, 4. Plaintiffs also moved for sanctions against Defendants for, inter alia, continuing collection efforts even after commencement of this action. Id. at 3. The court heard the motions on November 13, 2025. For the reasons provided below, the undersigned recommends that both motions be denied. . …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.