Prem S. v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PREM S.,
Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-01869-TLN-SCR
13 v. ORDER
WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE
15 ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY et al., 16 Respondents.
17 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Prem S.’s (“Petitioner”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order1 (“TRO”). (ECF No. 1.) Respondents filed an opposition. (ECF No. 6.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED.
22 On December 15, 2025, Petitioner filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 1.) Based on the substance of the petition and the relief requested therein, the Court liberally construed the petition as a motion for a TRO. (ECF No. 3.) See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).
Respondents were ordered to file an opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for TRO and provide the Court with copies of all referenced/relevant portions of Petitioner’s A-File and any 26 and all available records related to Petitioner’s allegations. (ECF No. 3 at 1–2.) …