Noem

Awninderjit S. v. Kristi Noem, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 24, 20251:25-cv-02000California3,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AWNINDERJIT S.,

Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-02000-TLN-SCR

13 v. ORDER KRISTI NOEM, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Awninderjit S.’s1 (“Petitioner”) Ex-Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Motion is GRANTED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Petitioner fled India after being persecuted by the Indian Central Government for supporting an opposition party. (ECF No. 2-1 at 4.) Petitioner entered the United States on 24 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of 25 the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits Petitioner’s full name, using only his first name and last initials, to protect sensitive personal information. See Memorandum Re: 26 Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration Opinions, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, Judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.