Rajpreet Singh v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 202518-72275California1,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 29 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJPREET SINGH, No. 18-72275

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-793-092

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 29, 2025**

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Rajpreet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Because the BIA adopted and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirmed the IJ’s decision citing Matter of Burbano, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872 (BIA 1994),

we review both the IJ’s and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.