Rajpreet Singh v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 202518-72275California1,220 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 29 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAJPREET SINGH, No. 18-72275
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-793-092
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 29, 2025**
Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Rajpreet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an
Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection
under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Because the BIA adopted and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirmed the IJ’s decision citing Matter of Burbano, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872 (BIA 1994),
we review both the IJ’s and…