People v. Waddle CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Robie, J.
Filed 12/29/25 P. v. Waddle CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Shasta) ----
THE PEOPLE, C102224
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No.
CRF97-0009429)
v.
JEREMY DEAN WADDLE,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Jeremy Dean Waddle appeals the trial court’s resentencing order, arguing prejudicial error occurred because he was not present at the resentencing hearing and did not waive his constitutional right to be present. The People agree defendant’s absence was error but claim it was harmless. We reverse and remand the matter with directions to hold a new hearing with defendant present or to obtain a valid waiver.