People v. Meyers CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 29, 2025A171131California2,836 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 12/29/25 P. v. Meyers CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A171131

v. JOSHUA NICHOLAS MEYERS, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 23-SF-006032-A) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Joshua Nicholas Meyers was found guilty by a jury of assault, false imprisonment by violence, sexual battery, and distributing a private image. The jury was unable to reach verdicts on rape charges. On appeal, Meyers contends the trial court abused its discretion by excluding evidence of the victim’s sexual conduct under California’s rape shield law, embodied in Evidence Code sections 1103 and 782. Meyers also asserts the court failed to properly award presentence conduct credit. We agree Meyers is entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.