Eduardo Daniel Barcenas v. General Motors LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20252:25-cv-09059California2,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:25-cv-09059-HDV-AJR EDUARDO DANIEL BARCENAS,

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND [16]

GENERAL MOTORS LLC, et al. Defendants. 17

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. INTRODUCTION This lemon law action arises out of Plaintiff Eduardo Daniel Barcenas’ purchase of a new 2020 GMC Sierra 1500 from Coachella Valley Buick GMC. Plaintiff alleges that his vehicle experienced “transmission defects” during the warranty period. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (“Motion”) [Dkt. 16], which asserts that the removal of this case on September 23, 2025 was untimely. Plaintiff maintains that removability was clear from the face of the complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court. Plaintiff also attempts to argue, in the alternative, that Defendant has still not established subject-matter jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed thoroughly in Chavarin v. General Motors LLC, No. 2:25-cv- 10 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.