Yalnizkurt

Ozgur Yalnizkurt v. Christopher Larose, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20253:25-cv-03752California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OZGUR YALNIZKURT, Case No.: 3:25-cv-3752-CAB-MSB

Petitioner,

ORDER TO RESPOND

v. CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, et al., [Doc. No. 1] Respondents. 18 On December 23, 2025, Petitioner Ozgur Yalnizkurt filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [Doc. No. 1 (“Petition”).] In his Petition, Petitioner claims that he is being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) without a bond hearing in violation of the Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Administrative Procedure Act, and 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b). [Petition at 6–12.] He seeks immediate release or, at minimum, a bond hearing within 14 days. [Id. at 12–13.] Having reviewed the Petition, the Court finds summary dismissal is unwarranted at this time. See Kourteva v. INS, 151 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 1128 (N.D. Cal. 2001) (“Summary dismissal is appropriate only where the allegations in the petition are vague or conclusory, palpably…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.