Pittman
Randy Dewayne Pittman v. Landsphere Property Management, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RANDY DEWAYNE PITTMAN, Case No. 25-cv-07705-PCP
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v.
LANDSPHERE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 Pro se plaintiff Randy Dewayne Pittman filed this action against his landlord Landsphere Property Management and property manager Vamsi Musunuru alleging that they unlawfully failed to create an accessible parking space for Mr. Pittman at his apartment building. He asserts claims under the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3); California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12927, 12955; California Civil Code § 54.1; and California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 526 and 1060. Concurrent with his complaint, Mr. Pittman filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, i.e., without paying the otherwise mandatory filing fee to initiate a lawsuit. The Court previously granted that application and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2), screened Mr. Pittman’s complaint. See Dkt. No. 13. As the Court explained in…