Acosta

Jose Acosta v. Super Save & La Michuacana Markets, Inc. dba Super Save Market, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20251:25-cv-00105California1,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00105-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

SUPER SAVE & LA MICHUACANA MARKETS, INC. dba SUPER SAVE (Doc. 24) MARKET, et al.,

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 12 I. Background Plaintiff Jose Acosta, who alleges he is disabled, asserts violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and state law for the failure to remove barriers to access at the Super Save Market located in Reedley, California. The Clerk of the Court entered default against defendants Super Save & La Michuacana Markets, Inc., Mohammed Jaber, Abdel Jaber, and Sultana Jaber on March 7, 2025. (Docs. 10-13.) Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on April 22, 2025. (Doc. 14.) Thereafter, on June 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement, along with a request for attorneys’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.