Doerer
Shelton Benoite v. J. Doerer, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELTON BENOITE , No. 1:25-cv-00959-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTNG FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
v. ACTION J. DOERER, et al., Doc.
Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 8, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and found that it failed to state a cognizable claim. Doc. 6. Plaintiff was granted leave to file a first amended complaint within thirty days. Id. at 7. On October 20, 2025, following plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate with the Court, the magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. Doc. 7. …