Hovhannes Margaryan v. Warden of California City Detention

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20251:25-cv-01582California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 No. 1:25-cv-01582-EFB (HC)

HOVHANNES MARGARYAN,

12 Petitioner, ORDER v.

WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA CITY

DETENTION, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Petitioner has also filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel for petitioner. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Within seven days from the date of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to Nic Cannarozzi, Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Edmund Brennan via email at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.