McCamey

Royalton McCamey v. Google and Alameda News Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20251:25-cv-01561California1,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROYALTON MCCAMEY, Case No. 1:25-cv-01561-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

GOOGLE and ALAMEDA NEWS

GROUP,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Royalton McCamey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that the District Court dismiss this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and prosecute this action. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this pro se action by filing a form “Complaint for a Civil Case” on November 14, 2025. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). The complaint names the following Defendants: (1) Google; and (2) Alameda News Group. (Id. at 2). The “Job,” or “Title,” for each Defendant is not stated. (Id). Nor does Plaintiff provide an address for either Defendant. (Id.). Under the “Basis of Jurisdiction” section of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.