Ninoska Veronica Flores Aguilar v. CoreCivic, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20251:25-cv-01952California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NINOSKA VERONICA FLORES No. 1:25-cv-01952-DJC-CSK

AGUILAR,

Petitioner,

ORDER

v. CORECIVIC, INC., et al., Respondents. 17 Petitioner is a noncitizen from Nicaragua who entered the United States in 2022 and was detained shortly thereafter. (Mot. (ECF No. 2-1) at 2.) Petitioner was then released from custody, though the parties dispute the terms of her release. (Id.; Opp’n (ECF No. 8) at 1.). In October of 2025, Petitioner was re-detained. (Mot. at 3; Opp’n at 1.) Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pet. (ECF No. 1)) and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2) seeking release from the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). Because there is a significant dispute as to the facts of this case, Petitioner has not established likelihood of success on the merits. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and sets a further briefing schedule on a preliminary 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.