Bruno

Scott Bruno v. County of Tuolumne et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20251:25-cv-01967California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT BRUNO, Case No. 1:25-cv-1967-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

v. JUDGE

COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED

16 (Doc. 2)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 On December 22, 2025, Plaintiff Scott Bruno (“Plaintiff”), pro se, filed this action asserting claims against the County of Tuolumne, Sheriff David Vasquez, Deputy Sorini, Deputy Rawlinson, Deputy Logan, Deputy Atkinson, and the Tuolumne County Sheriff’s Office. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff asserts claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disability Act, and negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and conversion. (Id.) Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages, declaratory and injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. (Id. at 31.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.