Warden

Parshant Parshant v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20251:25-cv-01968California678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PARSHANT PARSHANT, No. 1:25-cv-01968-DJC-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, including an ex parte request for a temporary restraining order. ECF No. 1 at 6. Petitioner has paid the filing fee for this action. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, the Clerk of Court will be directed to serve respondents with the habeas corpus petition. In addition, respondents are ordered to show cause why petitioner’s temporary restraining order should not be granted in light of the Court’s prior rulings in Lopez v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.