Senogor

Mark A. Jones v. Senogor, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20252:17-cv-01422California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. JONES, No. 2:17-cv-1422 DC AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SENOGOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed September 24, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to appear at the November 5, 2025 hearing on his former counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel and was cautioned that failure to appear would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 90. Plaintiff was further directed to contact the undersigned’s courtroom deputy to either provide an email address for receipt of Zoom information or request an in-person hearing. Id. After plaintiff failed to contact the court and did not appear at the hearing, he was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and cautioned that failure to respond would result in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.