Wheat

Wesley Smith, et al. v. Officer M. Wheat, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20252:21-cv-01859California1,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESLEY SMITH, et al., No. 2:21-cv-01859-DC-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’

RENEWED STIPULATED REQUEST TO

OFFICER M. WHEAT, et al., FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. (Doc. No. 61) 16 On October 3, 2025, Plaintiffs and Defendants filed a stipulated request to file under seal certain exhibits attached to the declarations of Eugene Chittock (Doc No. 48-3) and Paul Edwards (Doc. No. 48-5) filed in support of Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 50.) On November 10, 2025, the court granted the parties’ stipulated request in part and denied it in part. (Doc. No. 55.) Specifically, the court granted the parties’ stipulated request except as to exhibits G and H to the declaration of Eugene Chittock and exhibits B and C to the declaration of Paul Edwards. (Id. at 4–5.) As to exhibit G to the Chittock declaration (extensive portions of deposition transcripts) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.