Lewis

Dolores Lucero v. Philip Lewis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20252:24-cv-03116California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOLORES LUCERO, No. 2:24-cv-03116-DC-SCR (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

PHILIP LEWIS, (Doc. No. 32) Defendant.

16 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s September 17, 20251 order adopting the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. (Doc. Nos. 30, 32.) In her pending motion, Plaintiff invokes Rules 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which applies after judgment has been entered and provides that “[a] motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). “A timely filed motion for reconsideration under a local rule is a motion to alter or amend a judgment under [Rule] 59(e).” Bestran Corp. v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc., 720 F.2d 1019, 1019 (9th Cir. 1983). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.